Introduction

  • This election is for Tenure and Promotion Committee College of Arts and Humanities Representative. The rules for this election are listed below.
  • The nominees for the Tenure and Promotion Committee College of Arts and Humanities Representative election are listed to the right. The list to the right is not a ballot.
  • This list in not official until nominations have been closed and the list of nominees has been reviewed and verified by the APSCUF Nominations and Elections Committee.
  • The statements the candidates submitted with their nominations are given below. By clicking on a name in the list of candidates, you will be taken to that candidate's statement.
  • Clicking on the words Return to Top will return you to this part of the page.
  • If you are a nominee and wish to modify your statement or withdraw your nomination, click on the "Modify" button. You will need your password to make any modifications.
  • When you are finished, you may choose to view nominees for other elections, nominate yourself, view the list of elections, return to the APSCUF Nominations and Elections homepage, visit the APSCUF homepage, or visit the WCU homepage.
The nominees for Tenure and Promotion Committee College of Arts and Humanities Representative are:

Emily R. Aguiló-Pérez
Brenda L Gaydosh
Joseph W Moser
Dominik Wolff

Nominations close Mar 27, 2026.
Tenured Faculty in the College of Arts and Humanities may be nominated.

Rules for the Election

    • The following faculty may not be nominated for this seat since they have continuing representation on the committee--faculty from the Department of Art and Design, the Department of Theatre and Dance, and the School of Music
    • Each Department and each School within a College can have at most one representative on the university wide Tenure and Promotion Committee.
    • Membership on the committee is restricted to the following structure: 2 faculty representatives from each of the five academic Colleges and 1 faculty representative from the non-classroom faculty.
    • The election is decided by a majority of those casting votes unless such results violate the previous rules or the number of candidates does not exceed the number of positions to fill. In the later case, each candidate will be voted on by an approve/disapprove ballot.
    • Each candidate selected counts as a cast vote.

| Return to Top |

Emily R. Aguiló-Pérez


Department: English

I care deeply about ensuring that our university’s evaluation processes are clear, equitable, and supportive of faculty at every stage. Having navigated the final stage of promotion to full professor last year, I understand both the demands and the stakes of this process. My experience as a panelist for tenure and promotion workshops, along with my work on the English Department’s Evaluation Review Committee—where I have helped revise evaluation documents and engage in bias-awareness training—has strengthened my commitment to transparent standards and conscientious review practices. I would be honored to contribute this experience at the university level, helping to uphold fair and thoughtful evaluation processes for colleagues across disciplines by serving on the TeP committee.


| Return to Top |

Brenda L Gaydosh


Department: History

My understanding of this committee is that it will take much of my time in a short period. I am willing to do that. Working on this committee will help me to understand what my colleagues do in the college beyond the department of history. I am always looking to learn. I can be fair and objective.


| Return to Top |

Joseph W Moser


Department: Languages and Cultures

I truly enjoy supporting our colleagues from across the university as they make their way through the tenure and promotion process. It is also a great honor to work with colleagues on TeP, as we review and learn about all the amazing work that our colleagues are doing across the university. It has been a tremendous honor to serve on TeP for the past two years, and I would be very honored to gain your support to serve for another term.


| Return to Top |

Dominik Wolff


Department: Languages & Cultures

I respectfully submit my interest in serving again on the Tenure and Promotion (TeP) Committee. Having represented the College of Arts and Humanities from 2022-2024, I bring both experience and a deep appreciation for the seriousness and impact of this work to the table. During my prior term, I participated in a shared-review model in which committee members facilitated discussion of a subset of approximately 70 dossiers annually, an approach that required careful preparation, balanced judgment, and thoughtful cross-disciplinary dialogue. That experience strengthened my understanding of faculty achievement across diverse fields and reinforced my commitment to fair, rigorous, and collegial evaluation processes grounded in our collective standards. As someone who has since taken on expanded leadership roles at the department, college, and university level (including directing multi-track graduate programs and serving in elected governance positions), I recognize how central transparent and principled review is to institutional integrity and faculty confidence in our processes. I would welcome the opportunity to contribute again to TeP’s essential work with diligence, discretion, and a strong commitment to shared governance and the long-term academic strength of our university. Thank you.


| Return to Top |

Return to the APSCUF Nominations and Elections home page

Created and copyrighted by Clifford Johnston, 2000-12